Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Raimon Panikkar, 'apostle of inter-faith dialogue'


Raimon Panikkar, 'apostle of inter-faith dialogue,' dies
'Overcoming tribal Christology,' he said, is task of third Christian millennium
Aug. 31, 2010
By Joseph Prabhu (National Catholic Reporter)


Raimon Panikkar (photo by Ilvio Gallo)
Professor Raimon Panikkar, one of the greatest scholars of the 20th century in the areas of comparative religion, theology, and inter-religious dialogue, died at his home in Tavertet, near Barcelona, Spain, Aug. 26. He was 91.
Panikkar taught and lived in the United States from 1966-1987 and was known to generations of students here and around the world through both his lectures and his many books. What they heard and read were the arresting reflections of a multi-dimensional person, who was simultaneously a philosopher, theologian, mystic, priest and poet.
Panikkar was born the son of an Indian Hindu father and a Spanish Catholic mother Nov. 3, 1918. He received a conventional Catholic education at a Jesuit high school in Barcelona before launching his university studies in the natural sciences, philosophy, and theology, first in Barcelona and then in Madrid. Shortly thereafter, the Spanish Civil War broke out, and Panikkar was able to take advantage of his status as the son of a father who was a British citizen to go to the University of Bonn in Germany to continue his studies. When World War II started in 1939, Panikkar returned to Spain and completed the first of his three doctorates, this one in philosophy, at the University of Madrid in 1946.
It was around 1940 that he met Escriva de Balaguer, the founder of Opus Dei, with whom he had a close relationship. It was at Escriva's urging that he trained for the Catholic priesthood and was ordained in 1946. Panikkar continued to be associated with Opus Dei for about twenty years, breaking effectively with the organization only in the early 1960s. He was tight-lipped about this period of his life, saying only that he did not regret it. It is clear, however, when one compares the Panikkar of the 1940s and the early 1950s with the later Panikkar better known to the world as a pioneer of inter-religious dialogue, that he had moved a long way from his early roots.
In late 1954 when he was already 36, Panikkar visited India, the land of his father, for the first time. It proved to be a watershed, a decisive reorientation of his interests and of his theology.
He had entered a dramatically new world, religious and cultural, from the Catholic Europe of his youth. The transformation was aided by his meetings and close friendship with three monks, who like him were attempting to live and to incarnate the Christian life in Indian, predominantly Hindu and Buddhist forms: Jules Monchanin (1895-1957), Henri Le Saux, also know as Swami Abhishiktananda (1910-1973), and Bede Griffiths, the English Benedictine monk (1906-1993). All four of them, in different ways, discovered and cherished the riches and the deep spiritual wisdom of the Indic traditions, and attempted to live out and express their core Christian convictions in Hindu and Buddhist forms. To some extent this multiple belonging was made possible by their embrace of Advaita, the Indic idea of non-dualism, which sees the deep, often hidden, connections between traditions without in any way minimizing the differences between them.
One of Panikkar's many striking sentences looking back on his life's journey asserts: "I left Europe [for India] as a Christian, I discovered I was a Hindu and returned as a Buddhist without ever having ceased to be a Christian." A wealth of meaning lies in that assertion. Christianity in its historical evolution began as a Jewish tradition and then spread to the Greco-Roman world, acquiring along the way Greek and Roman cultural expressions which have given it a certain form and character. Panikkar, having grown up and having been trained in a traditional Catholic and neo-Thomist environment, had a profound knowledge of, and respect for, that tradition. This knowledge prepared him for discussions with some of the great minds of 20th-century Catholicism: Jean Danielou, Yves Congar, Hans Urs von Balthazar, and others. He was also invited to take part in the Synod of Rome and the Second Vatical Council. But Panikkar did not confuse or conflate historical contingency with spiritual truth. In Hinduism and Buddhism Panikkar found other languages, in addition to Biblical Hebrew, Greek philosophy, and Latin Christianity, to express the core convictions (the kerygma) of the Christian tradition.
That was the main thesis of The Unknown Christ of Hinduism, which Panikkar originally presented as a doctoral thesis to the Lateran University in Rome in 1961, based as it was on a close textual comparison between Thomas Aquinas and Sankara's interpretation of a canonical Hindu scripture, the Brahma-Sutras. Christ and his teaching are not, so Panikkar argues, the monopoly or exclusive property of Christianity seen as a historical religion. Rather, Christ is the universal symbol of divine-human unity, the human face of God. Christianity approaches Christ in a particular and unique way, informed by its own history and spiritual evolution. But Christ vastly transcends Christianity. Panikkar calls the name "Christ" the "Supername," in line with St. Paul's "name above every name" (Phil 2:9), because it is a name that can and must assume other names, like Rama or Krishna or Ishvara.
This theological insight was crucial for Panikkar because it provided the basis of the inter-religious dialogue that he and Abhishiktananda and Bede Griffiths were both advocating and practicing themselves. Far from diluting or in any way watering down core Christian beliefs and practices, such dialogue, in addition to fostering inter-religious understanding and harmony provided an indispensable medium for deepening the Christian faith. Such dialogue provides an insight and entry point into other, non-Christian names and manifestations of Christ. This was particularly important for Panikkar because together with other Asian theologians he saw how historical Christianity had attempted, especially during its colonial periods, to convert Christ into an imperial God, with a license to conquer and triumph over other Gods. This for Panikkar is the challenge of the post-colonial period inaugurated in the mid-to-late twentieth century and continuing into our present and the future. In his words, "To the third Christian millennium is reserved the task of overcoming a tribal Christology by a Christophany which allows Christians to see the work of Christ everywhere, without assuming that they have a better grasp or a monopoly of that Mystery, which has been revealed to them in a unique way."
Needless-to-say, such striking ideas carefully and rigorously argued and dramatically expressed got the attention of religious thinkers and secular institutions around the world. Panikkar was invited to teach in Rome and then at Harvard (1966-1971) and the University of California, Santa Barbara (1971-1987). He was now, as Leonard Swidler, occupant of the Chair of Catholic Thought at Temple University, called him, "the apostle of inter-faith dialogue and inter-cultural understanding."
Conversant in a dozen or so languages and fluent in at least six, he traveled tirelessly around the world, lecturing, writing, preaching, and conducting retreats. His famous Easter service in his Santa Barbara days would attract visitors from all corners of the globe. Well before dawn they would climb up the mountain near his home in Montecito, meditate quietly in the darkness once they reached the top, and then salute the sun as it arose over the horizon. Panikkar would bless the elements — air, earth, water and fire — and all the surrounding forms of life — plant, animal, and human — and then celebrate Mass and the Eucharist. It was a profound "cosmotheandric" celebration with the human, cosmic, and divine dimensions of life being affirmed, reverenced, and brought into a deep harmony. The celebration after the formal service at Panikkar's home resembled in some respects the feast of Pentecost as described in the New Testament, where peoples of many tongues engaged in animated conversation.
At the center of these celebrations, retreats, and lectures stood Panikkar himself and his arresting personality. People who heard or encountered him could not help but be struck by this physically small man who packed a punch and who managed to combine the quiet dignity of a sage, the profundity of a scholar, the depth of a contemplative, and the warmth and charm of a friend in his sparkling personality.
Not surprisingly, universities around the world, Catholic and non-Catholic, invited him to give lectures. To mention just a few among hundreds delivered, he was invited to give the William Noble Lecture at Harvard in 1973, the Thomas Merton Lecture at Columbia in 1982, and the Cardinal Bellarmine Lecture at the University of St. Louis in 1991. The most prestigious invitation, however, came from the University of Edinburgh, where Panikkar delivered the Gifford Lectures in 1989. These have recently been published by Orbis Books as The Rhythm of Being. Panikkar thus joined the select company of William James, Karl Barth, Albert Schweitzer, and Reinhold Niebuhr to mention just a few of the most famous Gifford lecturers. He was in fact the first Indian and the first Asian invited to give these lectures.
Some of Panikkar's other well-known books are The Vedic Experience; The Intrareligious Dialogue; Myth, Faith, and Hermeneutics; The Silence of God; The Cosmotheandric Experience; and The Invisible Harmony. Jaca Books in Italy is bringing out his collected works (Omnia Opera) in some 30 volumes, and Continuum Books in England and the Untied States is planning an English edition. There is also a helpful Web site www.raimonpanikkar.org.
Ours is a new era in world history, where thanks to globalization and the increasing communication between cultures and religions it is vital that there be a well-developed Catholic theology of religions. Panikkar was one of the pioneering and paradigmatic theologians of this new era. He has left us a rich and many-sided legacy from the liturgical and pastoral to the theological and sapiential. It behooves us who follow him to notice, absorb, and extend that legacy.
[Joseph Prabhu is a professor of philosophy and comparative religion at California State University, Los Angeles. He is editor of the book from Orbis, The Rhythm of Being.]

Friday, May 21, 2010

Changing Lives -Our Own Carey


Healing Invisible Wounds
Suzanne Carey dedicates her career to helping homecoming veterans
BY CLIFF NEWELL
The West Linn Tidings, May 13, 2010,

Suzanne Carey served in the U.S. Army and is now entering a new battlefield – helping veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. To accomplish this, Carey is seeking to earn her master’s of divinity degree at Marylhurst University.
VERN UYETAKE / west linn tidings
Call her Carey, not Suzanne.
As she says, “Old Army habits die hard.”
In any case, it seems like Suzanne Carey never really left the U.S. Army anyway, even though her enlistment ended in 2005.
It’s just that she is going onto another battlefield: Helping veterans returning from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan heal from wounds that don’t show on the outside. Injuries to the spirit, mind and soul.
“I feel it’s important to give back to veterans, as a veteran myself,” Carey said, who lives in Woodside, Calif. “I understand the culture, the lingo and the community.
“For me it makes sense. I’ve seen a lot of struggles and mental health issues and problems with returning home,” Carey said. “With my background in the Army and with counseling, I think I am uniquely qualified to help veterans.
“Plus, I really care about veterans.”
To accomplish her goals, Carey is seeking to earn her a master’s of divinity degree at Marylhurst University, which she believes is the perfect place to help her attain her career aspirations.
“Marylhurst is small, it has a spiritual base if you want it, and I love the professors,” Carey said. “They’ve done all kinds of ministry and they’re great mentors. They really believe what they teach.”
Carey’s teachers think just as highly of her.
“What I love about Carey is her radical sense of commitment,” said Dr. Sheila O’Connell-Roussell, “to her God, her country and humanity. She is transparent in her sense of mission … She wants to give the gift of faith to all whom she serves.”

The spiritual aspect is extremely important to Carey because it is why she joined the Army in the first place in 2001. On the surface, the move was baffling, because she had already earned a master’s of science in counseling and was experienced in marriage and family counseling, mental health, and suicide/crisis counseling. With her educational background, she was even qualified to be an officer. But she chose not to take that option.
Carey was definitely not a typical Army recruit. Yet she came to strongly believe she should sign up, for reasons that she did not understand at the time. So she did. Just a few weeks before Sept. 11, 2001.

“I was at Fort Dix, New Jersey for basic training,” Carey said. “When September 11 happened, that changed everything. We were put in lockdown and put on 24-hour watch. We didn’t know what was happening. We thought they were using scare tactics. I thought, ‘This can’t be real.’”
But it was real, and gradually Carey began to understand why she had felt such a strong desire to join the Army. Her fellow soldiers helped her understand.
“I kind of hung back in the shadows during basic training,” Carey said. “I was 24 years old then and most of the other new soldiers were 18 or 19. But no matter how much I stayed in the shadows, people always sought me out.”
She even earned a nickname for the spiritual qualities she could not disguise – “Nun Lady.”
“The sergeant called me that,” Carey said. “It made me laugh inside. But it was also validation that I was supposed to do something with my skills and desires.
“If I had not joined the Army, I would not have the same foundation I have today.”
Carey just missed being sent to the battlefront, but people like her are now badly needed by soldiers returning to the U.S. in ever-increasing numbers. Their problems are almost overwhelming.
“These soldiers are broken. They’ve lost a lot,” Carey said. “Being in the military will change someone’s life. There are the invisible scars – suicide, post-traumatic stress disorder, fatigue. A lot of citizens don’t understand this, which is a double whammy. There’s a huge readjustment to make among civilians who don’t understand.
“Often a returning veteran is isolated emotionally and turns to destructive behaviors, just looking for a way to cope.”
One more important factor drastically increases the chances for post-service problems. Due to lack of personnel, soldiers have been called on to make multiple tours of duty, from 8 months to 1½ years at a time.
“They don’t have enough time to heal, and we don’t have many resources to help them,” Carey said.
Now, Carey is stepping out of the shadows. She is planning to undergo intensive training to become an Army chaplain, and it is likely she soon will be serving at a VA hospital, giving a unique “veteran to veteran” kind of healing.
But this extremely goal-oriented young woman has something else in mind. Someday she wants to teach religion at Marylhurst University. It’s another way of “giving back.”
“That requires a PhD,” Carey said. “But I’m up for the challenge.”

Friday, May 14, 2010

Garrison Keillor of A Prairie Home Companion- on Applied Theology.



Our MAAT candidate, Jeanne E. P. Posted this question to Garrison Keillor on his blog-

http://www.publicradio.org/columns/prairiehome/posthost/2010/05/13/useless_degrees.php#more

You do a masterful job of presenting the life-long woes of the English major. However, I will graduate next month with a degree that I believe is far more employment-challenged. Might you have career suggestions for someone with a Master's degree in Applied Theology?
Jeanne E. P.
Talent, OR

Mr. Keillor’s Response is quite thoughtful! --
My dear theologian, The world is waiting for you. Economists are bewildered, politicians are confused, we humorists are less and less funny, the American people seem more devoted to unreality than ever before, and it's time for theology to clear things up for the rest of us. I assume that the "Applied" means that you won't be looking for a church job. You'll be heading out into the everyday world where the theological rubber meets the pavement. I think you should send your resume to Goldman Sachs and tell them in a hundred words why they need a theologian on staff. An applied theologian. You. It is still a Judeo-Christian world they operate in and nine out of ten Americans say they believe in God, so a big company ought to have a place for you — when in Rome, go with someone who speaks Italian. If Goldman Sachs turns you down, try UBS, try WalMart. We do not have a staff theologian at PHC but it wouldn't be a bad idea. What is the good of all those sad songs, the lost cowboys, the lascivious private eye, the languorous tales of prairie life? How does this contribute to the soul? You could guide us down these murky pathways, Jeanne. And I hope you wouldn't mind answering the phone and listening to audition CDs and popping popcorn. All part of the job.